Analyst firm predicts attempt to ensure all projects issuing carbon
credits are "additional" will curb supply and force up prices.
Attempts by the UN to restore confidence in its beleaguered Clean
Development Mechanism (CDM) carbon offsetting scheme will drive up the
cost of carbon credits, according to a new report released today.
The study from analyst firm Point Carbon estimates that new rules from
the CDM Executive Board requiring that projects entering the scheme
provide clearer evidence that they are "additional ", and would only
have gone ahead as a result of revenue raised through the sale of
CDM-approved Carbon Emission Reduction (CER) credits will have a major
impact on the supply of CERs.
Last month, Point Carbon said that bottlenecks in the approval process
for new CDM projects had led it to reduce its estimate on the supply of
CERs through to 2012 by 92 million tonnes, but now it has again revised
the estimate downwards by a further 30 million tonnes as a result of
the UN's crackdown on " non-additional" projects. The company now
expects just 1.9 giga tonnes worth of CERs to be issued by the end of
2012.
Report author Kjetil R?ne said that the drop off in the expected
supply of credits should lead to an increase in the CERs in the long
term. However, he warned that in the shorter term, prices for credits
from those projects now at risk of not being granted CDM-approval are
likely to fall "as the risk of non-delivery has increased".
Under the new rules, projects that were started before they submitted
an official Project Design Document to the UN Framework Convention on
Climate Change (UNFCCC) will now have to provide more extensive proof
that there was " serious consideration" given to attaining CDM approval
at an early stage of the project activity.
The changes follow a wave of reports claiming that some carbon
reduction projects had only applied for approval to issue CERs after
the projects are al ready up and running, indicating that the
initiatives would have gone ahead any way and as such they have not
delivered any additional carbon reductions in return for the CER
credits they sell.
An investigation last year by the WWF concluded that as many as a fifth
of CERs were flawed in this way and as a result a large number of
industrial projects in the developing world were generating windfall
profits through the scheme. It was followed by a similar study from
environmental group International Rivers, which claimed that many of
the hydro electric dam projects approved by the UN as CDM projects
would have gone ahead without the income guaranteed by CERs.
R?ne said that a significant number of projects were likely to be
affected by the crackdown. "Some projects have general additionality
problems, which mean they were planned for reasons other than CDM," he
explained. "Many of these were built primarily for commercial reasons
and should, according to the rules set by the Executive Board, not be
accepted as CDM projects that can generate CERs."
He argued that in the changes should help build greater confidence in
the global carbon market. "Some [critics] were claiming that
registering a project under the CDM had become a means for some
[projects] to print money, in the shape of CERs," he said. "By ensuring
a stricter practice on the additionality rule, it should be harder for
detractors of the CDM to claim this, making the market more robust."