Turkey's annual emission reduction efforts
will be facilitated by sustainable energy development projects funded
by voluntary carbon funds, with the number of these projects reaching
30 in the first quarter of 2008, resulting in a greenhouse gas
reduction of approximately 5 million tons, equaling about 20 million
euros in gains, if these energy companies engage in a carbon trading
scheme, according to an international environmental organization's
Turkey office. Yunus Arıkan, the senior project manager
for the Turkey office of the Hungary-based Regional Environmental
Center for Central and Eastern Europe (REC), says: "Based on
information acquired by REC-Turkey, as of October 2007, there are nine
projects in Turkey that have been involved in the voluntary carbon
trade, which accounts for a total of 700,000 tons of carbon emission
reduction annually. However, recently acquired data show the number of
projects is 30, accounting for approximately 5 million tons in carbon
emission reduction."
Speaking to
Today's Zaman, Arıkan said both the number and volume of projects make
Turkey one of the pioneering countries in this emerging market. He also
said the fact that Turkey hosts the first "gold standard" verified
emission reduction project globally qualifies Turkey for such a
position, but that if Turkey is excluded from the world compulsory
carbon market in the post-Kyoto period, it might lose these investments.
The Turkish government has decided to ratify the Kyoto Protocol and
will send a bill on the issue to Parliament, government spokesman Cemil iek said at a news conference on Monday. The Kyoto Protocol binds 37
industrialized countries to put limits on their greenhouse gases blamed
for the rise in global temperatures.
The Kyoto Protocol was signed in 1997 under the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Countries which
ratified it committed to reduce their emissions by an average of 5
percent from 1990 levels by 2012.
A
total of 176 countries are signatory to the protocol, but concerned
that its ratification before the completion of large-scale energy
investments would lead to serious economic and social problems, Turkey
chose not to sign. Contrary to
the beliefs of most Turkish critics of Kyoto, ratifying the protocol,
set to expire in 2012, will cost Turkey nothing. "Turkey has no
emission reduction obligations, and it will incur none even when it is
a party to Kyoto. As such, there will be no cost at all. Turkey will
not be obliged to reduce gas emissions until after 2012," said Haluk dalga, the chairman of Parliament's Environment Commission. He
also said if Turkey does not ratify the protocol, it will not be able
to negotiate effectively in the post-Kyoto era. It is still unclear
what obligations countries will assume post-2012 and that these will be
determined in negotiations to be completed in 2009.
However,
REC-Turkey warns that Turkey will not be eligible to join the Kyoto
Protocol's flexibility mechanisms even if it signs it and that for the
time being emission reduction projects in Turkey can only be pursued
through voluntary carbon markets. "Voluntary markets in Turkey shall be
designed so as to support Turkey's negotiations and efforts for the
country to be considered a carbon seller country by hosting Clean
Development Mechanisms (CDM) in the post-2012 period. Moreover, Turkey
shall consider a more active role for the government in the voluntary
carbon process so that the institutional framework and the process of
monitoring, permission and registry issues might evolve into a DNA and
registry system in the country in the post-2012 period," an REC-Turkey
report stated. While China
received sizable funds through CDMs to promote investments based on
reduced carbon emissions, Turkey has been ineligible to receive them.
Similarly, Turkey-based carbon certificates remain undervalued in
international carbon markets.
Carbon
emitting companies offset their pollution by purchasing credits from
renewable energy investors, which in turn gain financial backing for
their projects; trading is more profitable for countries that have
ratified the Kyoto Protocol. Businessman
and Wind Power and Hydro Power Plants Businessmen's Association
(RESSİAD) President emit Tolga Bilgin said he was the first to start
carbon emission trading in Turkey in voluntary markets, but complained
of low prices. "Countries that
signed the protocol can ask for at least 5 euros per ton, but it is
only about 3 or 4 euros because CDMs and its standards do not apply,"
Bilgin said.
'Turkey's ratification of Kyoto is of global importance'
Sibel
Sezer Eralp, the president of REC-Turkey, said when Turkey ratifies the
Kyoto Protocol, it will contribute to developments on the global level
in the post-Kyoto era. "Turkey's
ratification of the Kyoto Protocol could even provide a more
significant contribution to the international debate than Australia
joining the Kyoto in 2007 because Turkey, with its own special
circumstances, could bring a clear definition to the still unclear
developed/developing countries definitions under the UNFCCC," she said.
As
an Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)
country, Turkey was included in Annex I of the UNFCCC in 1992 and even
in Annex II, the list of relatively advanced industrialized countries
that have committed themselves to financial and technical transfers to
developing countries. Following objections from Turkey, it was
eventually removed from Annex II. But as a non-signatory to the
original 1997 protocol, it was also not included in Annex B, freeing it
from emission reduction commitments. At the end, Turkey was ranked as
an "advanced developing country" making it comparable to those of other
non-EU developing countries within the OECD.
"So
Turkey, as a non-EU member country and as a country not in Annex B, but
as country which is a member of the OECD, could cooperate with all
countries like South Korea and Mexico, falling under the category of
'advanced developing country'," she said. Turkey's
per capita emissions in 2003 amounted to 4.1 tons per year, which was
two-and-a-half times lower than average per capita greenhouse gas
emissions in the then EU-25 and more than three times less than the
average for all Annex I countries. Its potential to rapidly increase
its emissions is high, however, because it has a high number of
development projects.